The UFO Bunker

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

I am still renovating the site and also trying to add some great forums. Its similar to the once, ufodbase.

I am not deceived.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco  (Read 1234 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lashmar

  • Majic Eyes Only (Level X)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2442
    • View Profile
    • UFODP - something so insane it's got to work
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2010, 05:09:42 AM »

Precisely! If you grow your own it will still tar up your lungs, but it won't be irradiating your lungs, which is what is estimated to cause 90-100% of cancer.

Spot on. It's the crap they put into them. Fags have a small amount of HCL (Hydrochloric acid) so you can only Imagen what that's doing to your lungs! it must be tearing them to shreds.
Logged
Read Between The Lies!

SRO

  • Secret (Level II)
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2010, 01:02:44 PM »

If you grow your own tobacco, it may ACTUALLY be less harmful then marijuana. Hahaha.
Simply for the fact that marijuana contains higher levels of resins and tars that are insoluble. Otherwise relatively harmless, except for your lung capacity and cardio vascular health. Which is why I'm quitting pot, at the end of this month I'm putting the blunt down..


But definitely grow your own, around here you can grow up to 10 plants for personal use I believe, been a while since I checked. And if you want to sell it you can, but you need a license. Laws vary with location though.
Logged

lashmar

  • Majic Eyes Only (Level X)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2442
    • View Profile
    • UFODP - something so insane it's got to work
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2010, 01:14:38 PM »

I still wouldn't do any of it.
Logged
Read Between The Lies!

SRO

  • Secret (Level II)
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2010, 08:50:13 PM »

I would.

If you ever get your ass down to Canuck land I'll convince you to try it. :P
If I'm back at it that is.
Logged

earthman

  • Global Moderator
  • Top Secret (Level III)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 229
    • View Profile
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2010, 09:27:21 PM »

Ha ha. Man i should be glowing then. I've been smoking for over 30 years now. but i do have heart disease now. Got my third stint put in my heart in December. I am quiting soon. My cardio doctor gave me a perscription for Chantix. Have'nt filled it yet. They are killing me. Regnad will tell ya that. This last stint did work out. They put a new one inside of another one that was failing. Now my chest pain is worse all the time. Sucks. Doc wants me to quit before anything else.

earthman
Logged

lashmar

  • Majic Eyes Only (Level X)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2442
    • View Profile
    • UFODP - something so insane it's got to work
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2010, 04:08:39 AM »

Well this is quite handy. I've given Panda three weeks to quit, if no attempt is made I'm going to start using the scare tactics, so you're going to get the same amount of the as well Dave mate.

You know you there is a chemical in Fags, Acetaldehyde, which causes Alzheimers.
Logged
Read Between The Lies!

Regnad

  • Global Moderator
  • Majic Eyes Only (Level X)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 515
    • View Profile
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2010, 04:44:41 AM »

You go Lashmar tell Earthman how it is. He needs to quit for his health. ;D
Logged
Take a chill pill people!

lashmar

  • Majic Eyes Only (Level X)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2442
    • View Profile
    • UFODP - something so insane it's got to work
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2010, 06:56:48 AM »

You go Lashmar tell Earthman how it is. He needs to quit for his health. ;D

I haven't even started on the hydrochloric acid, the different types of Cyanide (hydrogen Cyanide, which was used in the Nazi Gas Chambers, and Iodine cyanide are just two), arsenic...not forgetting the Heavy Metals like lead, mercury and beryllium (which makes it hard for oxygen to get into your blood, you basically suffocate I think).

As I said to little one...you're basically smoking the end of a chemistry set.
Logged
Read Between The Lies!

SRO

  • Secret (Level II)
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2010, 10:48:49 AM »

Here's the chemistry kicking in here...

Taking one random chemical, which is Hydrogen Cyanide.

HCN, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Carbon bonded together in this element, so burning this chemical might produce something like this:

2HCN + 4 O2 ==> H2O + CO2 + CO + 2 NO2

Which means 2 HCN molecules will burn with 4 oxygen molecules to make one water molecule, a carbon dioxide and a carbon monoxide molecule, and 2 nitrogen dioxide molecules.

This is just the first equation I came up with that balanced out, it may not actually produce this exactly, but the point is that if you eat the cigarette you're poisoning yourself with hydrogen cyanide, but if you smoke it it will be reverted into other chemicals.

It may just do this:

HCN + O2 ==> HCNO2

In which case your lungs may remove the oxygen from the compound once again isolating the toxic HCN. Either scenario is possible, I'm unsure of which reaction is more accurate.
Logged

lashmar

  • Majic Eyes Only (Level X)
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2442
    • View Profile
    • UFODP - something so insane it's got to work
Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2010, 10:53:53 AM »

In which case your lungs may remove the oxygen from the compound once again isolating the toxic HCN. Either scenario is possible, I'm unsure of which reaction is more accurate.

Yes that's why I asked my friend to look into that as well but he said it would take a long time and a lot of Fags. Bottom line is he's doing this for something personal and he doesn't want to get into trouble for mis-using shit, fair enough as well.

The problem is when it's heated up the chemicals will change, as SRO said, so if you eat a fag you may get one chemical but when you heat it up and smoke it you might get something else.

Quite honestly I don't think they have a clue what happens once you inhale the smoke.
Logged
Read Between The Lies!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.112 seconds with 26 queries.